Hamm v. State

98 So. 3d 204, 2012 WL 4463279, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 16458
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 25, 2012·No. Nos. 5D12-968, 5D12-1093, 5D12-1148, 5D12-1149, 5D12-1150, 5D12-1151, 5D12-1152, 5D12-1153, 5D12-1154, 5D12-1155, 5D12-1202, 5D12-1203·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Shelton v. Sec’y, Dep’t of Corr., 691 F.3d 1348 (11th Cir.2012); State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012).

TORPY, PALMER, and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamm v. State, 98 So. 3d 204, 2012 WL 4463279, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 16458 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

98 So. 3d 204 (Hamm v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Adkins
96 So. 3d 412 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2012)