Hamlin v. State

334 S.W.3d 929, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 421, 2011 WL 1120109
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 29, 2011·No. ED 95075·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ira Hamlin (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamlin v. State, 334 S.W.3d 929, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 421, 2011 WL 1120109 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

334 S.W.3d 929 (Hamlin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. State
334 S.W.3d 929 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)