Hamlin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hamlin v. State

622 So. 2d 1176, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8922, 1993 WL 333578

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 3, 1993

DocketNo. 93-02565

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 622 So. 2d 1176 (Hamlin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hamlin v. State, 622 So. 2d 1176, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8922, 1993 WL 333578 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Steven B. Hamlin appeals from the summary denial of his postconviction relief motion and motion to amend and supplement defendant’s pending motion for postconviction relief. In reviewing the trial court’s order, we note that specific references are made to the transcript of the plea colloquy dated August 24, 1990, and the transcript of sentencing dated September 28, 1990. The trial court has failéd to attach copies of the relevant pages of the designated transcripts in support of its order.

Without ruling on the merits of the subject appeal, we remand this matter to the trial court to attach those portions of the record which support its order denying Hamlin’s motion.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Steven B. Hamlin appeals from the summary denial of his postconviction relief motion and motion to amend and supplement defendant’s pending motion for postconviction relief. In reviewing the trial court’s order, we note that specific references are made to the transcript of the plea colloquy dated August 24, 1990, and the transcript of sentencing dated September 28, 1990. The trial court has failéd to attach copies of the relevant pages of the designated transcripts in support of its order.

Without ruling on the merits of the subject appeal, we remand this matter to the trial court to attach those portions of the record which support its order denying Hamlin’s motion.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

622 So. 2d 1176, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8922, 1993 WL 333578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamlin-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack