Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/Hamlin v. . Neighbors

Hamlin v. . Neighbors

75 N.C. 66
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hamlin v. . Neighbors. Read the opinion of the Court — 75 N.C. 66 →
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 5, 1876·Published

Opinion

If the executor, Hamlin when he applied to be made party plaintiff, had filed a petition and shown a proper case, he might have been permitted under the authority of Mason v. Osgood, 71 N.C. 212, to continue the suitin forma pauperis. But, as he did not do that, then under the authority ofOsborne v. Henry, 66 N.C. 354, he ought to have been required to give a prosecution bond. There is error.

PER CURIAM. Reversed.

Cited: Christian v. R. R., 136 N.C. 322. *Page 64

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamlin v. . Neighbors, 75 N.C. 66 (N.C. 1876).

75 N.C. 66 (Hamlin v. . Neighbors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mason v. . Osgood
71 N.C. 212 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1874)
J. J. Osborne v. . Joseph Henry
66 N.C. 354 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1872)
Christian v. Railroad Co.
136 N.C. 321 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1904)