Hamlin v. . Neighbors

75 N.C. 66
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 5, 1876
StatusPublished

This text of 75 N.C. 66 (Hamlin v. . Neighbors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hamlin v. . Neighbors, 75 N.C. 66 (N.C. 1876).

Opinion

If the executor, Hamlin when he applied to be made party plaintiff, had filed a petition and shown a proper case, he might have been permitted under the authority of Mason v. Osgood, 71 N.C. 212, to continue the suitin forma pauperis. But, as he did not do that, then under the authority ofOsborne v. Henry, 66 N.C. 354, he ought to have been required to give a prosecution bond. There is error.

PER CURIAM. Reversed.

Cited: Christian v. R. R., 136 N.C. 322. *Page 64

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mason v. . Osgood
71 N.C. 212 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1874)
J. J. Osborne v. . Joseph Henry
66 N.C. 354 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1872)
Christian v. Railroad Co.
136 N.C. 321 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 N.C. 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamlin-v-neighbors-nc-1876.