Hamilton v. Khalife
This text of 2 A.D.3d 682 (Hamilton v. Khalife) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Michael Khalife appeals from a decision of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lockman, J.H.O.), dated December 18, 2002, which found that the indemnity clause of a certain lease issued by the defendant BMW Financial Services, N.A., Inc., was enforceable pursuant to CPLR 4544.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from a decision (see Schicchi v Green Constr. Corp., 100 AD2d 509 [1984]). Smith, J.E, Mc-Ginity, H. Miller and Rivera, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 A.D.3d 682, 768 N.Y.S.2d 626, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-v-khalife-nyappdiv-2003.