Hamilton v. Khalife

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hamilton v. Khalife

2 A.D.3d 682, 768 N.Y.S.2d 626, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13864

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 22, 2003·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Michael Khalife appeals from a decision of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lockman, J.H.O.), dated December 18, 2002, which found that the indemnity clause of a certain lease issued by the defendant BMW Financial Services, N.A., Inc., was enforceable pursuant to CPLR 4544.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from a decision (see Schicchi v Green Constr. Corp., 100 AD2d 509 [1984]). Smith, J.E, Mc-Ginity, H. Miller and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Michael Khalife appeals from a decision of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lockman, J.H.O.), dated December 18, 2002, which found that the indemnity clause of a certain lease issued by the defendant BMW Financial Services, N.A., Inc., was enforceable pursuant to CPLR 4544.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from a decision (see Schicchi v Green Constr. Corp., 100 AD2d 509 [1984]). Smith, J.E, Mc-Ginity, H. Miller and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Hamilton v. Khalife, 2 A.D.3d 682, 768 N.Y.S.2d 626, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13864 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

2 A.D.3d 682 (Hamilton v. Khalife) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related