AutoOne Insurance v. Fernandez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

AutoOne Insurance v. Fernandez

109 A.D.3d 469, 969 N.Y.S.2d 918

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 7, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 109 A.D.3d 469 (AutoOne Insurance v. Fernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

AutoOne Insurance v. Fernandez, 109 A.D.3d 469, 969 N.Y.S.2d 918 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75, inter alia, to permanently stay arbitration of a claim for uninsured motorist benefits, the petitioner appeals from a decision of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sunshine, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated September 7, 2012, made after a framed-issue hearing.

[470]*470Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The paper from which the petitioner appeals is merely a decision, as the paper did not grant or deny the petition or dispose of the proceeding. No appeal lies from a decision (see Benabu v Rienzo, 104 AD3d 714, 714 [2013]; Wall St. Mtge. Bankers, Ltd. v Hinds, 81 AD3d 818, 818 [2011]; Hamilton v Khalife, 2 AD3d 682, 682 [2003]; Matter of Diamond v Gallagher, 291 AD2d 404, 404 [2002]; Schicchi v J.A. Green Constr. Corp., 100 AD2d 509, 509-510 [1984]) and, thus, the appeal must be dismissed. Balkin, J.E, Leventhal, Lott and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75, inter alia, to permanently stay arbitration of a claim for uninsured motorist benefits, the petitioner appeals from a decision of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sunshine, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated September 7, 2012, made after a framed-issue hearing.

[470]*470Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The paper from which the petitioner appeals is merely a decision, as the paper did not grant or deny the petition or dispose of the proceeding. No appeal lies from a decision (see Benabu v Rienzo, 104 AD3d 714, 714 [2013]; Wall St. Mtge. Bankers, Ltd. v Hinds, 81 AD3d 818, 818 [2011]; Hamilton v Khalife, 2 AD3d 682, 682 [2003]; Matter of Diamond v Gallagher, 291 AD2d 404, 404 [2002]; Schicchi v J.A. Green Constr. Corp., 100 AD2d 509, 509-510 [1984]) and, thus, the appeal must be dismissed. Balkin, J.E, Leventhal, Lott and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 A.D.3d 469, 969 N.Y.S.2d 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/autoone-insurance-v-fernandez-nyappdiv-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack