Hamilton v. Commissioner

34 T.C. 927, 1960 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 84
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedAugust 31, 1960
DocketDocket No. 83907
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 34 T.C. 927 (Hamilton v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hamilton v. Commissioner, 34 T.C. 927, 1960 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 84 (tax 1960).

Opinion

OPINION.

Kern, Judge:

This case involves the question whether petitioner is entitled to a dependency exemption for Eachel Ann Oliver under the provisions of section 151(e), I.E.O. 1954. The answer to this question depends on whether Eachel is a dependent of taxpayer as that term is defined in section 152(a)(9).1 The precise question is whether petitioner furnished “support” to Eachel within the meaning of the quoted section of the Internal Kevenue Code.

The legislative history of section 152(a) (9) indicates that it was enacted for the purpose of affording a dependency exemption for a foster child or a child in the home of a taxpayer awaiting adoption. See Leon Turnipseed, 27 T.C. 158, 760. In such cases the support would he gratuitous and given to the recipient from motives of charity, affection, or moral obligation without thought of receiving in return a quid pro quo.

In the instant case it is clear to us on the record that petitioner’s primary purpose in furnishing board and lodging to Eachel during the taxable year, and making other expenditures for her benefit, was to obtain her services either immediately or in the future. It is our opinion that what Eachel received from petitioner during the taxable year was remuneration for her services, either present or future, and was not “support” as that term is used in section 152(a) (9). Cf. concurring opinion of Judge Withey in Leon Turnipseed, supra at 761.

We therefore conclude that petitioner is not entitled to a dependency exemption for Eachel Ann Oliver during the taxable year.

Decision will be entered for the respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kieffer v. Commissioner
1987 T.C. Memo. 213 (U.S. Tax Court, 1987)
Hamilton v. Commissioner
34 T.C. 927 (U.S. Tax Court, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 T.C. 927, 1960 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-v-commissioner-tax-1960.