Hamby v. State of Tennessee

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee
DecidedAugust 9, 2021
Docket2:21-cv-00032
StatusUnknown

This text of Hamby v. State of Tennessee (Hamby v. State of Tennessee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hamby v. State of Tennessee, (M.D. Tenn. 2021).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT GREENEVILLE

DARREN B. HAMBY, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) No. 2:21-CV-00120-JRG-CRW ) STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Court is in receipt of a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in which Petitioner, a prisoner of the Tennessee Department of Correction housed in the Trousdale Turner Correctional Center (“TTCC”), seeks habeas corpus relief from a conviction for aggravated burglary in Cumberland County, Tennessee [Doc. 1 at 1]. For the reasons set forth below, this action will be TRANSFERRED to the Northeastern Division of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. As noted above, Petitioner is currently incarcerated in the TTCC, which is located in Trousdale County, Tennessee, which lies within the Nashville Division of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. 28 U.S.C. § 123(b)(1). However, his petition challenges a conviction in Cumberland County, Tennessee [id.], which lies within the Northeastern Division of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. 28 U.S.C. § 123(b)(2). Thus, the Middle District of Tennessee is both the district in which Petitioner is incarcerated and the district where his conviction was entered, and that is where he must file his habeas corpus petition. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Moreover, Petitioner’s place of confinement may change, while the location of the entry of his judgment of conviction will remain constant, and a court may transfer a case to another district “in the interest of justice.” 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). Accordingly, the consistent practice in the Tennessee federal courts is to transfer habeas corpus petitions to the district (and division) in

which the convicting court is located. Anderson v. Mays, No. 3:18-CV-00550, 2018 WL 9811901, at *2 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 8, 2018). For these reasons, the Clerk will be DIRECTED to transfer this action to the Northeastern Division of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee and to close this Court’s file. AN APPROPRIATE JUDGMENT ORDER WILL ENTER. ENTER:

s/J. RONNIE GREER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tennessee
28 U.S.C. § 123(b)(1)
Cure or waiver of defects
28 U.S.C. § 1406(a)
Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241(d)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hamby v. State of Tennessee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamby-v-state-of-tennessee-tnmd-2021.