Hamby v. . Allman

130 S.E. 926, 190 N.C. 872, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 225
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 12, 1925·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The controversy on trial narrowed itself to an issue of fact, which the jury alone could determine. A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the case has been heard and determined substantially in agreement with the law bearing on the subject, and that the validity of the trial should be sustained. All matters in dispute have been settled by the verdict, and no action or ruling on the part of the trial court has been discovered by us which we apprehend should be held for reversible error.

Plaintiff’s right to recover is not precluded by the statute of frauds, under the jury’s finding that the defendant was a principal debtor. Taylor v. Lee, 187 N. C., 393.

The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamby v. . Allman, 130 S.E. 926, 190 N.C. 872, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 225 (N.C. 1925).

130 S.E. 926 (Hamby v. . Allman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taylor v. . Lee
121 S.E. 659 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1924)