Ham v. Ozmint

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: December 28, 2010
• Docket: 10-7216
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7216

ANGELO B. HAM, a/k/a Angelo Bernard Ham,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

JON OZMINT; ANTHONY J. PADULA; JOHN J. BROOKS; BRUCE OBERMAN; RONNIE CRIBB; DARRYL CAIN, Sergeant of SMU at L.C.I.; CHRISTOPHER GODFREY, Officer of SMU at L.C.I.,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, Chief District Judge. (6:10-cv-01095-DCN-KFM)

Submitted: December 16, 2010 Decided: December 28, 2010

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Angelo B. Ham, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Barry Johnson, LEE ERTER WILSON HOLLER & SMITH, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Angelo B. Ham appeals the district court’s

interlocutory order accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and denying Ham’s motion for a preliminary

injunction. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. See Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc.,

129 S. Ct. 365, 374 (2008). Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Ham v. Ozmint, No. 6:10-

cv-01095-DCN-KFM (D.S.C. Aug. 23, 2010). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* We have jurisdiction over this appeal from an interlocutory order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) (2006).