Ham v. Ozmint

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6259

ANGELO B. HAM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JON OZMINT, SCDC Director; LAURIE MILLER, LCI Grievance Coordinator,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, District Judge. (6:08-cv-02896-DCN)

Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 4, 2009

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Angelo B. Ham, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Angelo B. Ham appeals the district court’s orders

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, and denying his

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm the dismissal of Ham's § 1983 complaint for the

reasons stated by the district court, and, finding no abuse of

discretion, further affirm the denial of the Rule 59(e) motion. *

Ham v. Ozmint, No. 6:08-cv-02896-DCN (D.S.C. Sept. 12, 2008).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* See Temkin v. Frederick County Comm'rs, 945 F.2d 716, 724 (4th Cir. 1991).