Halsey v. Brown

3 Day 346
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 15, 1809·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

tif the Court.

The question in this ease is, whether evidence of a particular custom or usage can he given in evidence to control a general law.

The general law applicable to the commercial world, ‘ that owners of vessels are answerable for the contracts and conduct of their masters, when acting whir,., -he Scope of their authority, must be admitted. I But as it is a principie, that the general common law may be, and in many instances is, controlled by special custom; so the general commercial law may, by the same reason, be controlled by a special local usas» . so far as that usage extends; which, will operate upon all contracts of this nature, made in view of, or with reference to, such usage. \

We are, therefore, of opinion, that the evidence offered to prove the particular usage in this case was ad» missible.

New trial not to be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Halsey v. Brown, 3 Day 346 (Colo. 1809).

3 Day 346 (Halsey v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fine v. Advance Realty Co.
4 Conn. Super. Ct. 264 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1936)
Patterson v. Crowther
16 A. 531 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1889)
Sturges v. Buckley
32 Conn. 18 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1864)
Barlow v. Lambert
28 Ala. 704 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1856)
Bowen v. Newell
2 Duer 584 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1853)
Bridgeport Bank v. Dyer
19 Conn. 136 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1848)
Leach v. Perkins
17 Me. 462 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1840)
US v. Don Fernando De La Maza Arredondo & Others
31 U.S. 691 (Supreme Court, 1832)
Renner v. Bank of Columbia
22 U.S. 581 (Supreme Court, 1824)
Renner v. President of the Bank of Columbia
9 U.S. 581 (Supreme Court, 1824)
Barber v. Brace
3 Conn. 9 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1819)
Citizens' Bank v. Nantucket Steamboat Co.
5 F. Cas. 719 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1811)