Halpern v. State Furniture Co.

186 Misc. 551, 61 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2096
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided March 21, 1946·Published

Opinion

Memorandum Per Curiam.

An owner of a building upon leased ground, whether title to the building is acquired by a quitclaim deed, or a full warranty deed, is authorized, under subdivision (d) of section 8 of chapter 315 of the Laws of 1945 [amdg. L. 1945, ch. 3, the Commercial Bent Law], to institute summary proceedings, where he has complied with all the other requirements of the statute, where the term of the tenancy has expired. Also an omission to place upon the copy petition served the name of the notary, is not a jurisdictional defect (Civ. Prac. Act, § 105; see People ex rel. N. Y. City Omnibus Corp. v. Miller, 282 N. Y. 5; People ex rel. Fifth Ave. & 37th St. Corp. v. Miller, 261 App. Div. 550).

Final order affirmed, with $25 costs.

Hammer, McLaughlin and Eder, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Halpern v. State Furniture Co., 186 Misc. 551, 61 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2096 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

186 Misc. 551 (Halpern v. State Furniture Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People Ex Rel. New York City Omnibus Corp. v. Miller
24 N.E.2d 722 (New York Court of Appeals, 1939)
People ex rel. Fifth Avenue & 37th Street Corp. v. Miller
261 A.D. 550 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)