Halpern v. State Furniture Co.
This text of 186 Misc. 551 (Halpern v. State Furniture Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An owner of a building upon leased ground, whether title to the building is acquired by a quitclaim deed, or a full warranty deed, is authorized, under subdivision (d) of section 8 of chapter 315 of the Laws of 1945 [amdg. L. 1945, ch. 3, the Commercial Bent Law], to institute summary proceedings, where he has complied with all the other requirements of the statute, where the term of the tenancy has expired. Also an omission to place upon the copy petition served the name of the notary, is not a jurisdictional defect (Civ. Prac. Act, § 105; see People ex rel. N. Y. City Omnibus Corp. v. Miller, 282 N. Y. 5; People ex rel. Fifth Ave. & 37th St. Corp. v. Miller, 261 App. Div. 550).
Final order affirmed, with $25 costs.
Hammer, McLaughlin and Eder, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
186 Misc. 551, 61 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halpern-v-state-furniture-co-nyappterm-1946.