Hallman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hallman v. State

114 So. 3d 410, 2013 WL 2321184, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8465

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 29, 2013

DocketNo. 3D12-2538

StatusPublished

This text of 114 So. 3d 410 (Hallman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hallman v. State, 114 So. 3d 410, 2013 WL 2321184, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8465 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Desmon Hallman appeals the trial court’s summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to rule 3.850(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Because the trial court summarily denied the motion without attaching the portions of the record that refute Hall-man’s claims raised in his motion, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing or other appropriate relief. See Fla. RApp. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A),(D).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Desmon Hallman appeals the trial court’s summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to rule 3.850(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Because the trial court summarily denied the motion without attaching the portions of the record that refute Hall-man’s claims raised in his motion, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing or other appropriate relief. See Fla. RApp. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A),(D).

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 So. 3d 410, 2013 WL 2321184, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hallman-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.