Hallman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hallman v. State

114 So. 3d 410, 2013 WL 2321184, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8465

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hallman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11728 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 29, 2013·No. No. 3D12-2538·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Desmon Hallman appeals the trial court’s summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to rule 3.850(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Because the trial court summarily denied the motion without attaching the portions of the record that refute Hall-man’s claims raised in his motion, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing or other appropriate relief. See Fla. RApp. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A),(D).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Desmon Hallman appeals the trial court’s summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to rule 3.850(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Because the trial court summarily denied the motion without attaching the portions of the record that refute Hall-man’s claims raised in his motion, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing or other appropriate relief. See Fla. RApp. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A),(D).

Reversed and remanded.

Hallman v. State, 114 So. 3d 410, 2013 WL 2321184, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8465 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

114 So. 3d 410 (Hallman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.