Hallman v. State
86 So. 3d 1292, 2012 WL 1697267, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7835
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hallman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11728 →
Opinion
Pursuant to the parties’ agreed motion to reverse and remand for new trial due to lack of transcript and inability to reconstruct the record, we reverse and remand. [1293]*1293See Jackson v. State, 984 So.2d 668, 669 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).
Reversed and Remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hallman v. State, 86 So. 3d 1292, 2012 WL 1697267, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7835 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
86 So. 3d 1292 (Hallman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jackson v. State
984 So. 2d 668 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)