Halliday v. Jacksonville & Alligator Plank Road Co.

6 Fla. 304
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 15, 1855
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 6 Fla. 304 (Halliday v. Jacksonville & Alligator Plank Road Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Halliday v. Jacksonville & Alligator Plank Road Co., 6 Fla. 304 (Fla. 1855).

Opinion

DuPONT, J.

This cause is brought up from a Justice’s Court, by writ of certiorari; and the question presented for our consideration is, whether this Court will entertain jurisdiction of the same.

[305]*305The second section of the fifth article of the Constitution provides that “the Supreme Court, except in cases otherwise directed ip this Constitution, shall have appellate j urisdiction only, which shall be coextensive with the State, under such restrictions and regulations, not repugnant to this Constitution, as may from time to time be prescribed by law; provided that the said Court shall always have power to issue writs of injunction, mandamus, quo warranto, habeas corpus, and such other remedial and original writs, as may be necessary to give it a general superintendence, and control of all other Courts.”

It is not doubted, but that under the latitude given by the said proviso, a writ of certiorari will lié from this Court to any of the inferior jurisdictions, whenever an appropriate case may be presented, or it shall become necessary for the attainment of justice. This, however, is not such a case; the object of the plaintiff in certiorari, in removing his case to this Court, is to have certain errors, which are alleged to have been committed by the Justice of the Peace who decided the case, corrected here. It is a sufficient answer to his application to say, that the' statutes have provided an ample remedy for him, by ganting to him an appeal to, or writ of certiorari from the Circuit Court.—. Vide Thomp. Dig., 364.

Let the certiorari be dismissed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

CRISTINA HERNANDEZ v. CITY OF MIAMI CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2023
State ex rel. Alabama Policy Institute
200 So. 3d 495 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2015)
State, Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Freeman
63 So. 3d 23 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Custer Medical Center v. United Automobile Insurance Co.
62 So. 3d 1086 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2010)
Haines City Community Dev. v. Heggs
658 So. 2d 523 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)
State ex rel. Shevin v. Eastmoore
286 So. 2d 545 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1973)
Lorenzo v. Murphy
32 So. 2d 421 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1947)
Ex Parte Alabama Textile Products Corporation
7 So. 2d 303 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1942)
Laney v. Holbrook
6 So. 2d 623 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1942)
Kilgore v. Bird
6 So. 2d 541 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1942)
Rifas v. Gross Baum
143 So. 600 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
Coslick Et Vir. v. Finney
140 So. 216 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Broome
126 So. 149 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Palmer v. Johnson Const. Co.
121 So. 466 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)
First National Bank v. Gibbs
82 So. 618 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1919)
Basnet v. City of Jacksonville
18 Fla. 523 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1882)
Edgerton v. Mayor of Green Cove Springs
18 Fla. 528 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1882)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Fla. 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halliday-v-jacksonville-alligator-plank-road-co-fla-1855.