Hallenback v. Whitaker
17 Johns. 2
Opinion
The commissioner, Mr. Matthews, before whom the affidavit was taken, does not appear as the attorney in this cause, as his name is not on the record. Though he may be a partner with the defendant’s attorney, in the profits of his business, as he is not the attorney on record, in this cause, we think the case does not come within that of Taylor v. Hatch. The objection cannot, therefore, be allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hallenback v. Whitaker, 17 Johns. 2 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1819).
17 Johns. 2 (Hallenback v. Whitaker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Kindt
98 F. 403 (S.D. Iowa, 1900)
In re Mauer
16 F. Cas. 1162 (D. Nevada, 1878)
Adams v. Mills
3 How. Pr. 219 (New York Supreme Court, 1848)