Hallenback v. Whitaker

New York Supreme Court

Hallenback v. Whitaker

17 Johns. 2

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 15, 1819

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 17 Johns. 2 (Hallenback v. Whitaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hallenback v. Whitaker, 17 Johns. 2 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1819).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The commissioner, Mr. Matthews, before whom the affidavit was taken, does not appear as the attorney in this cause, as his name is not on the record. Though he may be a partner with the defendant’s attorney, in the profits of his business, as he is not the attorney on record, in this cause, we think the case does not come within that of Taylor v. Hatch. The objection cannot, therefore, be allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The commissioner, Mr. Matthews, before whom the affidavit was taken, does not appear as the attorney in this cause, as his name is not on the record. Though he may be a partner with the defendant’s attorney, in the profits of his business, as he is not the attorney on record, in this cause, we think the case does not come within that of Taylor v. Hatch. The objection cannot, therefore, be allowed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 Johns. 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hallenback-v-whitaker-nysupct-1819.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack