Home/New York Court of Common Pleas/Hall v. Waterbury

Hall v. Waterbury

5 Abb. N. Cas. 356
CourtNew York Court of Common Pleas
DecidedJanuary 15, 1879
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 5 Abb. N. Cas. 356 (Hall v. Waterbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hall v. Waterbury, 5 Abb. N. Cas. 356 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1879).

Opinion

Van Hoesen, J.

Motion for security for costs denied. The assignee in bankruptcy is not the trustee of the estate of any debtor within the meaning of the Revised Statutes (Ferriss v. Am. Ins. Co., 22 Wend. 586). Nor is he under section 317 of Code of Procedure personally liable for costs, except where guilty of misconduct or bad faith (Reade v. Waterhouse, 52 N. Y. 587).

His non-residence is, therefore, not any reason for requiring security for costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jordan v. Bridges
132 F. 362 (W.D. Tennessee, 1904)
Pursley v. Rodgers
44 A.D. 139 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)
Flynn v. Tinney
60 N.Y.S. 791 (New York Supreme Court, 1899)
Podmore v. Seamen's Bank for Savings
28 Misc. 488 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)
Podmore v. Seamen's Bank for Savings
27 Misc. 317 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1899)
Dunne v. American Surety Co.
58 N.Y.S. 140 (New York Supreme Court, 1899)
McDougal v. Gray
4 N.Y.S. 74 (New York Supreme Court, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Abb. N. Cas. 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-waterbury-nyctcompl-1879.