Flynn v. Tinney

60 N.Y.S. 791
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 10, 1899·Published

Opinion

McADAM, J.

Section 3271 of the Code applies to this case. Whenever an executor or administrator is plaintiff, whether resident or nonresident, the application is addressed to the discretion of the court (McDougal v. Gray [Sup.] 4 N. Y. Supp. 74; Hall v. Waterbury, 5 Abb. N. C. 356), and when it appears, as it does here, that the action is brought in good faith, the application for security for costs should be denied (Ryan v. Potter, 4 Civ. Proc. R. 80).

The motion is accordingly denied, with $10 costs to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flynn v. Tinney, 60 N.Y.S. 791 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1899).

60 N.Y.S. 791 (Flynn v. Tinney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McDougal v. Gray
4 N.Y.S. 74 (New York Supreme Court, 1888)
Hall v. Waterbury
5 Abb. N. Cas. 356 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1879)