Hall v. State

11 So. 3d 1002, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8738, 2009 WL 1766568
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 24, 2009·No. 4D07-3776·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order summarily denying appellant Albert L. Hall’s amended motion for postconviction relief. As to his second ground for relief, based on “newly discovered evidence” in the form of an unsworn affidavit or letter of a purported eyewitness, we affirm without prejudice. Appellant may file a second amended rule 3.850 motion within thirty days of the date of issuance of this court’s mandate, with a sworn affidavit or letter from the eyewitness Kenya Shaw which does not contain any disclaimer that the information in it is true and correct to the best of his information or belief. Moss v. State, 943 So.2d 946 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Brooks v. State, 972 So.2d 958 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007).

WARNER, TAYLOR and CIKLIN, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall v. State, 11 So. 3d 1002, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8738, 2009 WL 1766568 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

11 So. 3d 1002 (Hall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fletcher v. State
53 So. 3d 1249 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)