Hall v. State
936 So. 2d 729, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13713, 2006 WL 2366392
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hall v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 891 So. 2d 1066 →
Opinion
In this criminal appeal, appellant Hall argues that the trial court reversibly erred by curtailing his cross-examination of the victim, Elizabeth Faircloth. Having thoroughly reviewed the evidence in this case, we are persuaded that even if the trial court erred when it upheld an objection to Hall’s cross-examination question, this was harmless error. Accordingly, we AFFIRM Hall’s conviction and sentence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hall v. State, 936 So. 2d 729, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13713, 2006 WL 2366392 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
936 So. 2d 729 (Hall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.