Hall v. State
912 So. 2d 362, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 16009, 2005 WL 2464507
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hall v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 853 So. 2d 546 →
Opinion
We affirm the conviction and sentence. Based on the State’s confession of error, we remand this cause to the trial court to correct the scoresheet to reflect that the primary offense is a level 9 offense. This correction does not affect the sentence, however, and may be done without Appellant’s presence. Mathis v. State, 704 So.2d 1114 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).
AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hall v. State, 912 So. 2d 362, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 16009, 2005 WL 2464507 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
912 So. 2d 362 (Hall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mathis v. State
704 So. 2d 1114 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)