Hall v. State
676 So. 2d 84, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7468, 1996 WL 387777
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 12, 1996·No. No. 95-2724·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the judgment and sentence. However, we again certify the question posed in Harris v. State, 659 So.2d 1360 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995), review granted, 670 So.2d 938 (Fla.1996), as being of public importance, to wit:
IS THERE ANY LIMIT UPON A TRIAL JUDGE’S RIGHT TO IMPOSE A DEPARTURE SENTENCE UNDER THE GUIDELINES BASED SOLELY ON AN UNSCORABLE CRIMINAL OFFENSE COMMITTED AFTER THE CRIME BEING SENTENCED FOR, SUCH AS NOT DEPARTING BEYOND THE PERMISSIBLE SENTENCING RANGE, HAD THE LATER OFFENSE BEEN SCORED?
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hall v. State, 676 So. 2d 84, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7468, 1996 WL 387777 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
676 So. 2d 84 (Hall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hall v. State
692 So. 2d 155 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)