Hall v. State
458 So. 2d 1193, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2377, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16566
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hall v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 444 So. 2d 1019 →
Opinion
The trial court departed from the sentencing guidelines for the following stated reason:
The court has gone outside the sentencing guidelines in this case on you, Mr. Hall, because you were previously placed on probation and the court considers the fact that you violated the conditions of that probation to be sufficient aggravating circumstances to no longer be bound by the sentencing guidelines. For that reason the court has gone outside the guidelines.
We affirm the departure from the guidelines. Carter v. State, 452 So.2d 953 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Gordon v. State, 454 So.2d 657 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hall v. State, 458 So. 2d 1193, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2377, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16566 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
458 So. 2d 1193 (Hall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gordon v. State
454 So. 2d 657 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Carter v. State
452 So. 2d 953 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)