Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hall v. State

Hall v. State

453 So. 2d 932, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1794, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14651
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hall v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 444 So. 2d 1019 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 14, 1984·No. No. 83-556·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s convictions of robbery and aggravated assault are affirmed. Rose v. State, 425 So.2d 521 (Fla.1983); Welty v. State, 402 So.2d 1159 (Fla.1981); Spinkellink v. State, 313 So.2d 666 (Fla. 1975); Machado v. State, 363 So.2d 1132 (Fla.3d DCA 1978). However, the minimum-mandatory three-year sentences, pursuant to the provisions of Section 775.-087(2) Florida Statutes (1981), should have been ordered to be served concurrently. Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla.1983); Parson v. State, 450 So.2d 924 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Whitehead v. State, 446 So.2d 194 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

Therefore the convictions are affirmed and the sentences are affirmed except as modified by this opinion to make the minimum-mandatory three-year sentences run concurrently rather than consecutively.

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall v. State, 453 So. 2d 932, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1794, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14651 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

453 So. 2d 932 (Hall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MacHado v. State
363 So. 2d 1132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Rose v. State
425 So. 2d 521 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)
Welty v. State
402 So. 2d 1159 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Parson v. State
450 So. 2d 924 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Spinkellink v. State
313 So. 2d 666 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)
Whitehead v. State
446 So. 2d 194 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)