Hall v. Rhett

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 275
CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina
DecidedDecember 14, 1721
StatusPublished

This text of 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 275 (Hall v. Rhett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hall v. Rhett, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 275 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1721).

Opinion

Upon Motion this day, made unto this Court by Mr. Whitaker, being of the Plantiff’s Council, it was alledged that the Plantiff since the exhibiting his [276]*276Bill in this Court against the Defendant finds the same defective, and the said Defendants not yet having answered the said Bill: It was Therefore Prayed that the said Plantiff may be at liberty to amend his said Bill without Costs; Which is Ordered accordingly; The said Plantiff amending The Defendant’s copy of the said Bill.

Intr.

Thos Lamboll Deputy Register

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-rhett-ctchansc-1721.