Hall v. Rhett
6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 275
Opinion
Upon Motion this day, made unto this Court by Mr. Whitaker, being of the Plantiff’s Council, it was alledged that the Plantiff since the exhibiting his [276]*276Bill in this Court against the Defendant finds the same defective, and the said Defendants not yet having answered the said Bill: It was Therefore Prayed that the said Plantiff may be at liberty to amend his said Bill without Costs; Which is Ordered accordingly; The said Plantiff amending The Defendant’s copy of the said Bill.
Intr.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hall v. Rhett, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 275 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1721).
6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 275 (Hall v. Rhett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.