Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/Hall v. Queen City Coach Co.

Hall v. Queen City Coach Co.

32 S.E.2d 325, 224 N.C. 781, 1944 N.C. LEXIS 245
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 13, 1944·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Sbawell, J.

The court below was not dealing with the final issue, but merely with the question whether the temporary restraining order should be continued to the hearing. As the judge was not requested to find the facts in writing, and did not do so, under our practice it will be presumed that, for the purpose of his order, he found facts sufficient to support it. Therefore, we are unable to find grounds for reversal.

However, in this Court, counsel for I. E. Chandler demurred, ore tenus, to the complaint as not stating a cause of. action against him. Upon examination of the pleadings, we are of the opinion-that the demurrer should be sustained, and it is so ordered. The action as to Chandler is dismissed.

Except as thus modified, the judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall v. Queen City Coach Co., 32 S.E.2d 325, 224 N.C. 781, 1944 N.C. LEXIS 245 (N.C. 1944).

32 S.E.2d 325 (Hall v. Queen City Coach Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Orkin Exterminating Co. of Raleigh, Inc. v. Griffin
128 S.E.2d 139 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1962)
Seymour v. WS BOYD SALES COMPANY
127 S.E.2d 265 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1962)
Howze v. McCall
106 S.E.2d 236 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1958)
Brown v. Doby
87 S.E.2d 921 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)
Edmonds v. Hall
72 S.E.2d 221 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)
National Surety Corp. v. Sharpe
65 S.E.2d 138 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)
State v. . Alverson
33 S.E.2d 135 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1945)