Hall v. Quarterman
This text of 534 F.3d 365 (Hall v. Quarterman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 15, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
No. 06-70041
MICHAEL WAYNE HALL, Petitioner-Appellant
versus
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee
Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth (06-CV-436)
Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
We grant a certificate of appealability on Michael Wayne
Hall’s Atkins claim.1 The case will be scheduled for oral argument
before this panel.
We are not presently persuaded to grant and we defer decision
upon the application for a certificate of appealability on Hall’s
Ring2 and Penry3 claims until after oral argument. The Court does
1 Atkins v. Virginia , 506 U.S. 314 (2002); Hall v. Texas, 537 U.S. 802 (2002). 2 Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002). 3 Penry v. Johnson, 532 U.S. 782 (2001). not request but the parties may supplement the Ring and Penry
claims and offer argument, if they wish to do so.
So ORDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
534 F.3d 365, 2008 WL 2579273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-quarterman-ca5-2007.