Hall v. POWER
This text of 311 A.2d 612 (Hall v. POWER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion
Tbe order of tbe Commonwealth Court is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Roberts, Mr. Justice Nix, and Mr. Justice Manderino dissent for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinions in Sweigard v. Department of Transportation, 454 Pa. 32, 35, 38, 309 A. 2d 374, 376, 377 (1973); Brown v. Commonwealth, 453 Pa. 566, 577, 579, 580, 305 A. 2d 868, 871, 874, 875 (1973); Biello v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 454 Pa. 179, 187, 301 A. 2d 849, 853 (1973); and Thomas v. Baird, 433 Pa. 482, 485, 252 A. 2d 653, 655 (1969).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
311 A.2d 612, 455 Pa. 645, 1973 Pa. LEXIS 819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-power-pa-1973.