Hall v. POWER

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Hall v. POWER

311 A.2d 612, 455 Pa. 645, 1973 Pa. LEXIS 819

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 26, 1973·No. Appeal, 155·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

pee Curiam,

Tbe order of tbe Commonwealth Court is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Roberts, Mr. Justice Nix, and Mr. Justice Manderino dissent for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinions in Sweigard v. Department of Transportation, 454 Pa. 32, 35, 38, 309 A. 2d 374, 376, 377 (1973); Brown v. Commonwealth, 453 Pa. 566, 577, 579, 580, 305 A. 2d 868, 871, 874, 875 (1973); Biello v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 454 Pa. 179, 187, 301 A. 2d 849, 853 (1973); and Thomas v. Baird, 433 Pa. 482, 485, 252 A. 2d 653, 655 (1969).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

pee Curiam,

Tbe order of tbe Commonwealth Court is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Roberts, Mr. Justice Nix, and Mr. Justice Manderino dissent for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinions in Sweigard v. Department of Transportation, 454 Pa. 32, 35, 38, 309 A. 2d 374, 376, 377 (1973); Brown v. Commonwealth, 453 Pa. 566, 577, 579, 580, 305 A. 2d 868, 871, 874, 875 (1973); Biello v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 454 Pa. 179, 187, 301 A. 2d 849, 853 (1973); and Thomas v. Baird, 433 Pa. 482, 485, 252 A. 2d 653, 655 (1969).

Hall v. POWER, 311 A.2d 612, 455 Pa. 645, 1973 Pa. LEXIS 819 (Pa. 1973).

Pincite

311 A.2d 612 (Hall v. POWER) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related