Hall v. Glass

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hall v. Glass

104 S.E. 512, 25 Ga. App. 710, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 163

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 19, 1920

Docket11285

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 104 S.E. 512 (Hall v. Glass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hall v. Glass, 104 S.E. 512, 25 Ga. App. 710, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 163 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

This case is controlled by the decision of this court in Floyd v. Massachusetts Mills, 25 Ga. App. 519 (103 S. E. 801), the exceptions being taken to the action of the trial judge in sustaining the plaintiif’s demurrer to the defendant’s plea and in refusing to allow an amendment thereto. It not appearing that any final judgment has been entered in the case and that exceptions have been taken thereto, the bill of exceptions must be dismissed. It is directed that the official copy of. the bill of exceptions now of file in the office of the [711]*711clerk of the trial court shall operate as exceptions pendente lite. Civil Code (1910), §§ 6152-6154.

Decided October 19, 1920.

Complaint; from city court of Dawson — Judge Edwards. January 20, 1920.

Yeomans & Wilkinson, for plaintiff in error. Parks & Parks, contra.

Writ of error dismissed with direction.

Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenkins, P. J.

This case is controlled by the decision of this court in Floyd v. Massachusetts Mills, 25 Ga. App. 519 (103 S. E. 801), the exceptions being taken to the action of the trial judge in sustaining the plaintiif’s demurrer to the defendant’s plea and in refusing to allow an amendment thereto. It not appearing that any final judgment has been entered in the case and that exceptions have been taken thereto, the bill of exceptions must be dismissed. It is directed that the official copy of. the bill of exceptions now of file in the office of the [711]*711clerk of the trial court shall operate as exceptions pendente lite. Civil Code (1910), §§ 6152-6154.

Decided October 19, 1920.

Complaint; from city court of Dawson — Judge Edwards. January 20, 1920.

Yeomans & Wilkinson, for plaintiff in error. Parks & Parks, contra.

Writ of error dismissed with direction.

Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 S.E. 512, 25 Ga. App. 710, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-glass-gactapp-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack