Bateman v. Gamble & Co.
This text of 138 S.E. 255 (Bateman v. Gamble & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only assignment of error in this case is upon a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the defendant’s plea and answer. Under the ruling of the Supreme Court in Bozeman v. Ward-Truitt Co., 141 Ga. 45 (80 S. E. 320), the case is prematurely before this court, and the motion of the defendant in error to dismiss the writ of error must be allowed. See, in this connection, Hall v. Glass, 25 Ga. App. 710 (104 S. E. 512); Floyd v. Massachusetts Mills, 25 Ga. App. 519 (103 S. E. 801); Tinsley v. Gullett Gin Co., 21 Ga. App. 512 (94 S. E. 892); Johnson v. Battle, 120 Ga. 649 (48 S. E. 128); Thomas v. Berry, 151 Ga. 7 (4) (105 S. E. 478); Lang v. Hall, 25 Ga. App. 118 (102 S. E. 877).
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
138 S.E. 255, 36 Ga. App. 782, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bateman-v-gamble-co-gactapp-1927.