Bateman v. Gamble & Co.

138 S.E. 255, 36 Ga. App. 782, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 316
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 11, 1927·No. 17784·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

The only assignment of error in this case is upon a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the defendant’s plea and answer. Under the ruling of the Supreme Court in Bozeman v. Ward-Truitt Co., 141 Ga. 45 (80 S. E. 320), the case is prematurely before this court, and the motion of the defendant in error to dismiss the writ of error must be allowed. See, in this connection, Hall v. Glass, 25 Ga. App. 710 (104 S. E. 512); Floyd v. Massachusetts Mills, 25 Ga. App. 519 (103 S. E. 801); Tinsley v. Gullett Gin Co., 21 Ga. App. 512 (94 S. E. 892); Johnson v. Battle, 120 Ga. 649 (48 S. E. 128); Thomas v. Berry, 151 Ga. 7 (4) (105 S. E. 478); Lang v. Hall, 25 Ga. App. 118 (102 S. E. 877).

Writ of error dismissed.

Stephens and Bell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bateman v. Gamble & Co., 138 S.E. 255, 36 Ga. App. 782, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 316 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

138 S.E. 255 (Bateman v. Gamble & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. First National Bank
177 S.E. 73 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
McCray Refrigerator Sales Corp. v. New
162 S.E. 632 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)