Hall v. Gittings's Lessee

2 H. & J. 380
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided June 15, 1806·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

The Court,

at this term, dissented from the opinions of the General Court in the first and second bills of exceptions, and concurred with that in the third bill of exceptions. Rut the court were of opinion, that the certificate of the clerk of Prince-George’s county court gave an authority to the clerk of Baltimore county court to record the deed from Ogle and wife to Bosley, mentioned in the first bill of exceptions, the court considering the words “legally authorised and assigned,” within the meaning of the act of November li'66, ch. 14.

JUDGMENT REVERSE».

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall v. Gittings's Lessee, 2 H. & J. 380 (Md. 1806).

2 H. & J. 380 (Hall v. Gittings's Lessee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dennis v. Hearn
129 A. 354 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1925)
Malone v. Long
97 A. 643 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1916)
Marlow v. McCubbin
40 Md. 132 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1874)
Friend v. Hamill
34 Md. 298 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1871)
Fouke v. Fleming
13 Md. 392 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1859)
Warner v. Hardy
6 Md. 525 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1854)
Johns v. Reardon
3 Md. Ch. 57 (Maryland Chancery Ct, 1852)