Hall v. Gittings's Lessee

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Hall v. Gittings's Lessee

2 H. & J. 380

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedJune 15, 1806

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 2 H. & J. 380 (Hall v. Gittings's Lessee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hall v. Gittings's Lessee, 2 H. & J. 380 (Md. 1806).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court,

at this term, dissented from the opinions of the General Court in the first and second bills of exceptions, and concurred with that in the third bill of exceptions. Rut the court were of opinion, that the certificate of the clerk of Prince-George’s county court gave an authority to the clerk of Baltimore county court to record the deed from Ogle and wife to Bosley, mentioned in the first bill of exceptions, the court considering the words “legally authorised and assigned,” within the meaning of the act of November li'66, ch. 14.

JUDGMENT REVERSE».

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court,

at this term, dissented from the opinions of the General Court in the first and second bills of exceptions, and concurred with that in the third bill of exceptions. Rut the court were of opinion, that the certificate of the clerk of Prince-George’s county court gave an authority to the clerk of Baltimore county court to record the deed from Ogle and wife to Bosley, mentioned in the first bill of exceptions, the court considering the words “legally authorised and assigned,” within the meaning of the act of November li'66, ch. 14.

JUDGMENT REVERSE».

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 H. & J. 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-gittingss-lessee-md-1806.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack