Hall v. Crestwood Lake Section 8 Holding Corporation
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK LISA HALL, Plaintiff, -against- 24-CV-3657 (LTS) CRESTWOOD LAKE SECTION 8 HOLDING CORPORATION; WOODNER ORDER OF DISMISSAL COMPANY; BARRY TIMMONS; ALEXANDRIA HERCULES; JONATHAN WOODNER, Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated August 19, 2024, the Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within sixty days. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the complaint, filed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction of any state law claims Plaintiff may be asserting. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter judgment in this action. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 19, 2024 New York, New York
/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hall v. Crestwood Lake Section 8 Holding Corporation (Hall v. Crestwood Lake Section 8 Holding Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.