Hall v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad

199 N.W. 491, 199 Iowa 607
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedJune 24, 1924
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 199 N.W. 491 (Hall v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hall v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad, 199 N.W. 491, 199 Iowa 607 (iowa 1924).

Opinion

Preston, J. —

-Plaintiff alleged that, at about 1 o’clock on the morning of.March 9, 1921, decedent, Buffington, rode a string of cars which were being switched in defendant’s yards, and in the performance of hiS duties traveled south over and upon a car upon which he had set the brake, and another car; that, when Buffington reached the south end of the second-car, the defendant negligently switched other cars with great force and speed in and upon the switch track, and caused the cars to come in contact with such violence as to throw the said Buffing-ton from the car, and his body was run over by the ea^s, and said Buffington was killed. It was also alleged that the cars that came in contact with the one upon which deceased was riding were not under the control of any of defendant’s employees, at the time deceased was thrown upon the tracks and *609 under the'wheels. Other grounds of negligence were charged in regard to the condition of the running board and the track. Plaintiff also pleaded an ordinance of the city of Cedar Rapids. The trial court withdrew from the jury all claims of negligence except the first two. Defendant denied generally, and pleaded assumption of risk and contributory negligence.

Though the petition alleges that deceased was thrown from the second car, the evidence shows that he was run over by the fourth car in the string of seven, and that in some manner he fell or was thrown between the third ear from the north and the fourth car. This is practically conceded.

The errors assigned relate to the sufficiency of the evidence to show negligence and causal relation between the acts charged and the injury, rulings on evidence, instructions, misconduct of counsel in argument, and other matters.

Deceased was about 28 years of age, and was an experienced railroad switchman. He had been employed as a brakeman and switchman at Cedar Rapids for 8 years, 5 of which were continuously for the defendant in its yards at Cedar Rapids. The switching was being done, at the time of the accident, in the same ivay it had been done during his employment. The night of the accident, he went to work about 8 o’clock P. M. The crew lunched, a short time before the accident, when Sheldon, who had charge of the switching, told the crew the moves they were going to make. He thinks it was about ten minutes from the time deceased was sent to perform this duty of setting the brakes that he saw him dead. Deceased was informed by the foreman of the moves that the engine would make. The accident happened shortly after midnight. The night was dark. It had been raining, or misting, was cold and sleety, and there was no moon. Deceased had a lantern. The switch tracks extended practically, though not quite, north and south, and are numbered from the main line towards the east. This plat shows the situation better than it can be described. The plat here set out is only about half of the blue print, north and south. The blue print shows the tracks extended still farther north or northeast, about as far as, or perhaps a little farther than, the portion we insert.

*610

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

John Rooff & Sons, Inc. v. Winterbottom
86 N.W.2d 131 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1957)
Anderson v. Sheuerman
6 N.W.2d 125 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1942)
Low v. Ford Hopkins Company
1 N.W.2d 95 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1941)
Whetstine v. Moravec
291 N.W. 425 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1940)
Northwest States Utilities Co. v. Ashton
65 P.2d 235 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1937)
Boles v. Hotel Maytag Co.
253 N.W. 515 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1934)
Thompson v. Anderson
252 N.W. 117 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1934)
Heavilin v. Wendell
241 N.W. 654 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1932)
Field v. Southern Surety Co.
235 N.W. 671 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1931)
Turner Simplicity Mfg. Co. v. Bremner
40 F.2d 368 (Eighth Circuit, 1930)
Disalvo v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
200 N.W. 729 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1924)
Jackson v. Hanrahan
198 Iowa 704 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 N.W. 491, 199 Iowa 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-chicago-rock-island-pacific-railroad-iowa-1924.