Hall v. Annucci

• Court: District Court, S.D. New York
• Decided: January 25, 2024
• Docket: 7:19-cv-05521
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

MEMO ENDORSE fe

eile Sates. WisrevetLouel [amare □ gern ys ict aF pVElW pale | ed er VE □□ foholt Half Tern | — Aa Trt Ape/ lant, (rae peh □□

nk __WheTiaw Maesuasif

KR ho □□□□ Py Pamides "OOLCS . Foon pe -hidgmeni prart-SSLOVE 7. EF fel LB. DLDEK. ____ ___._. Defeansens= has wo □□□□

— AT NolILAW

Al) say rar. porelhy oF perguay

bole bo Woliow Fon Meher From this CeurT gaan) oF SummAty ti rgarer] Yo Fa OE Ref orang! s + EOE ty fEmBER 4b, 20aas 4s Avwartaglep

Make dose) 10 alheyes henale- caren lOve S/ghIE Onl 88/or2s Bay THE DSGBer evoking THE Appemranie OF 185uES ysten7~ Coucr’> MTEG (21 Ty. HERE THE

eT leaparhielily Feiler Te OfsERVE

Ip ee Ton Stiles Su yume Leal Haloings

wi DSS v/e/ ake, CE MS, AT YU □ Oli) = Aeganding 8x Lege Poros) T8 A HE □□

\Aterheele ApyminneTiilive bpleS ior! □□

Gevser aw, (feta Flag Fired

Kale LANL). Conshqufes Geow bs Lele A Final Sunymest, o« □□

| Reese: □ Symemr Coa] Ale intr 9s dy

fess Blake, Stuff ty tne linitenscanaly □

kygalres, Fk0vg A Connect, Leen Fre □□ □

GOVE TOY fe Lg0./ fies aeyp bey. fe □□□□□□ □ Lacencosny /1Ens. TE THe PHETS leF The epttii cult CASE, Compane Bell a

sag US, 695,677 (2002) boii □□□

lor, FAY LS: FoTt- Yor Cs00))

All lager _ LHOLERS Onl, Je Ae! L047 Pour

tet ross. Rho le = Cord CERN S Hg Couitt / ar hue TE Coudsenrn te THe NheFennants beatles From! LoareeTions Law, 8€2Tony —

Y89, LAR, TOYS. of THE

Wyeth NYS-SO¢¢S, dizediive Uo, 4OY6, —

7OLEADGH, Tob GNM? □□□□

Nodes Breee77ve- Lo. YOY —_ppto

Jasevarn te [PCO FetIy lad as p4via1 Mage. □□□

73 Frling 4 -YAUE S93

_ Lease Ti ffa> Deen Jhcciastote □□

□□ Soh boeqaerTine~ Fam UL" Rules

BGeaverttans (NE ffl0 CBS S he OF □□ VMEN) OFS, Ally’ □ kevbens sS ME domi iStoibrie.

| eeARaSTF 00) MBean bo Avast ibe, C4eees , 7%. OF BL ATEY)

Fyvorn oF” Defence Mast cyponu Ti Wir

ER oreo Us ASB T Apna THT Ape BTRART IVE Geld ENO AMQUSTIOW

Atesenm 113 se. Potxeern , □□□ | Stat Atozarna ERITEd BEcsuser_ IeFerhan[s_

_ferfes 7B_Comphy aol Timely (ectksiineg Matar Geren. Mars + □□ A

geacetatal lays FaretTton. 0

Yo ee Vbenning hy, T1s themahy Ties po

nee 10. YO Go TAtlaT ((0rKs C0, Yave 3d bBrys Ve bdEeVezemipje. L8ser

ee Faye 6s To □□ □□ fee

_| Cencenver Mety cal” wagewty □□

ypyehan 5 4 _fanT SONG ENS «

Ler esl hie Les, sf ~ 3,- Lateral * feexo □□

rezp fr CAT CEAtUseE AID THETA py OR. No

eA fale □□□ LHS fle? hed, [KEE _avervanoe Files 13/05 28/7 ) Milegecrshy,

Beg JULIE EL £80 VEsT7 0720.0 , ~bnSTZEE | eras Pileerifepoes Pay LO, br OMange-: oP Veta, feogen ne ADYWEES TO OO ___-

il Appi oun/ GALEN cEx givs]_ Medien] x, Ylteian tc Lens (leteiuen CORE, _0Y/ fI0/¢. Such COLL, perferouaitetion | cess Dele mines Moar Han f~2 Move | gprssts 18.3 D_tory WATE: (KBE __fgarevnrdte Wa, IG7-/7)——

ian, LB. THe Sey pint of THE, 7B;- LéTe«al Afryp Keplactsmers? yeny □□□ eg fT Perel peat Fon) | Bane FE ConsTrcTin rv ~ pv tiuspbe FV é: MH eniting lisense, degen we □□□

\BeFennedtE 78+ /ur2 To. Cbnpger [sAaagecs—

| -goIng SECT ons Pom OPE Loursh . wol” CGHEeREN Fan bwFet tasted

‘2 ty VyG7T Jop) Lees +7 LAS "YbsdayeTEh (V0.1 FF Hits Or T/AtEL STaplly lococcus jor Mexsa, on MASA,

Vb Séla0N Wuewan tons □□□ S&innr TOF THE Ope TeaTionr RECAUSE patg TO_THe- lTirel girevannwte Fifer, _

OLE Getter ign) frCERLN GY tras Uniting □□ □

(Ares? ATE “4s gust Kallen, the

titi! Le GeO, Aeeipen, tons Lehijiers Vie -

AEN sarecmice vera Fi/ooe ee

Dyce Nor peo ARETE. Fi. Then 7s Ka TimtratT ho a_rlegeranonry Th wELETUNUATION, MEV ET THE kiss beFoonmnvt$ Omrssiony) oF WESS +a) SAE Geer eain te Lieu des □□

lag | pastisssiig (9reo batices, ( byasTne Ao,

goye, 87 ZOLECI, Fol. 6 Gay ake ECHU3)CV J

[3, Vsti” Cowal CRROMEDUS y OQve7e Joleen wrens Legare ert 75, Fol oo Ab. byectitve- Mor YOU frtadetsttyy Riles AF

uf, cane, Te Phare. of lah hesextr ly, RER A HIOKMAT, titt b108 be Fettevrints

Mehata tnsavntlaele Cece Henne □

pee 20 at 59) (sae tho, Gustaua tomes, |\Lll Kice, Fay Fp, 87, 92 G2, □□□ Bey DMT Cour?” Fata 73 erwe~ eFeroan Begaare lace Priam , FES test ye, KI, dinzetive- □□□□

|b UTES FRET AEEEGES. hong cede then AP rammuT ia ve Eine Alltel pire le te fife sP madts Comply wg eAPE □□□ fUEo Jourininly

Gareumce Mleogream, — □□

□□ Megewhy, oF rt Faas func

Char (be Breen» THE” YUevante fiteganim tout Amount Td A MERE

bfewotorte hb, O39-EV- 6473, □□ acol, tb lerwy-a006) )

Aerefirnw- Tis 0btibe- pnt W6t7or2 May ween as FreSe Tireqpeoreat” Motion TST Mitdiss v. [baits ithe, 56? Fi □□ Q Cir ado, Casto. actos Tiley S40 □□□

||87%6" Gano )/ Ulin Titles we DaTe, Yn

|FIdk 37 8Y CCA L-/9G)), FOX (lite From, _

Strang —Sarrsgment ne Fryoa oF

/houtlFF stou)> hen Kuhever From Stumny Saegmen) tw Favon OP DeFer raw Betlautes THE p0vR- s/s /aaeD

YAEL) ORE MANIC CxP Ath. gppecr~ THe otto Ff te wit lupe er gouerane, tell prttayent, prothine

Adsense. Leer Leones, 77 US:e AY, C1994) ; Manaus ve Simonson , lIl 1457973 (Sbwy-cacre Bed Majo L doASF¥ LL 506072 Cubn ee

| | Gil LO GMb) ence Shi Jo BE 909 STN Betause- (Ro-Be- Suemstron), CES wor Leek Argeuanh, Basis of Lar ann Pact “(sen ueyzeke Lolams, 190 MS: 8/9, 3as- (1999) □ bes, Hetv-b9Y, 20/5 LL 1963 Wo AF □□ i 3. lary -~Jo1s) Cake, Hem epi. Leiten SHE 313 F.3d $67, ¢H Cali. JQol/),) kecher seule Be 9earTEs HORE Mav 0 SP Provriin tea FhaerCegoleasr nT LTRS. twanathrele Reine oF yartariee Arogeam

fluc TE FB/ loud “A | (yoveroninsy Kles

OMI CETEN IN G THE “FRO bers 8109 V oF 237nealis He

fet VANCE MLO CET Mee Jung wuaentTTo

reetTinn) Lito, L389 WIAA □□ Fert

Ne 9s oF TIED NYCRR WY S~ Nodes □□

onecTIVE No, Y0 Yo, 3EEiun LOf- STAIAICH, | vohe (gan) ~Liblent Gru ewanie vovolves □□

See, Heat aor halen F garevany □□□□ | penserrel} Fol. 60). uth Thlure To Follow) □□ AM roles wcrc DreTive No. Yo Ys -RAIREREK.

the Eetlensrow eg nement; uy avartoale, —

Csee Ross y BIUKE STP US ot 643-6 Potts “TEhzn) exten tro” woHenc_Derenna$:

Alege Farlaae to Follow atl Mules □□□□ pyceéTive Kenoeried AdmuwisTRalive

VET Unvrvartaple:, He lxaat mw _ ZeFereeh toivalaality ” as □□

Téktual exteylion Td MAneAtoay SKHAUSTIOA Ants “esTeppel” Ars (RECOME One oF _ □

_ittedee TAVCEEE FrteT Ors □□□ ReTERM LO Arvas bags lit Ya. G Ross at 18 se) Count. □ tobettle iumate Has □ llexhtusTer His on Hen AdminstRatvive □

(femebies_ must Fa 0s On _t0 WETHER th Mastz_ (CEMEMLES WwenReE ~ Avat lag le” Tb Se

alee, Kalas <2 Bucanad, ton,

W333. ples. Suchauan, We. □

LL YET x,

(5 lo YET ABAI AT □□

4 fpr, 972 C lra.Qolb) □

Koss nt /36-S tk Qt L cr guelng

Devnet! Fevliae To Co OO

Ag onl. Fp laae 7 Coma! 1 FH

Gated gree bess 7 □□

prebtwe We» Joyo ssinly “ules Uuneen Freon La □ alleen THATS oe

lgaieva Me DP Rode 9 ARvaThyga OF A pees THnvrgA }

aeqmesen 60 OE ae

les Gucing ess LST 101 iT (eee

Case, PH7E I hsthrict Couat§ © i )

tant oF □□ mma S$ @valud]iow □

Ferbants Favor May secngerecs ae pw

eFerorancyfS oMege TD ASSESS

terth STimehn ere’ ae. eon ~ Com bran be

CT BAs - in DeVeKm SOME oF TRE

|@& dmnusT7tat? ve anak oe + be ahty® -

ema

Aubsg men □□

_ | seu)» Be Loven oT Fon WoeTen

fo □□ fetmine LoeteR A OP

pute as 78 Bua re ot dental

ee Tive (CeMeEd : goths

Defewnents. Fasuae £5 Jolbos all im

Deetessiwe AS CSBolsHED TF wo OES

As E87TablsHEd May Toe ive □□ □□

_ eae, Suly ryisputs over material Frets ere might defect tHe outtome pF THe Unnenm THE youeruing L bd LOL

| properly paethibe tHe ErTiy oF Summany gaunt, (Awherson 4 Liaenty Lorsy ,¥ □□□ B92, 248 19%), Hemphill, STATE oF Mew _ 396 F 38 6%, 696 C1Ci2 2OOY) AEE □

cope THER IneFEvpanTs Own Actiows twhititing |

llextAeusT7on) E87aps THEem From Aaising the —

Farlune Ta HaUsT As An AFFiimative peFensG tre CohETHER Speen! CincumsT □□□□□ des Hh remaTes Fre/uper To Comply vot

_|A Seton Medical gasevante TO, Comply LertA _ fe epiausT/o? LezurnemenT Mongoven, □□□□ plhawl¥® Fads To exhaust” jes ArmmsTettve | eeqnetsres tHe Couat MUST Conisper Tose MemePiex were vss laegle □□

Men, The Ties Care, beEFen bast’ FR □□□□ _ FeHow AI) guimchuer □ flules_ prin The

Qovennivg Diet No, KEWnENIED wer Armntinntive Membres UvAvas fale, ter Claser Hisfoey srw rreaTes thar Iraren oat ales 70 Foloed Rots FON pe CESSIG

| pemarter Jarevan20eS Loh {ERDETES AWE | exthtaution Cemery Lyorval lable, (HERVEY 4 □ Orficens, | tHnough bo, bl2 Fi Appx. SBT Ren do)

he DAEXIER: 3, Couche im thc Seton Cytutl” fave HENS paae-Thinl ei serTiary HerArslgs ExXHwukTior7 lLOHEW AS HEME, THe pees CAnno7~ Be- Mer BASED □□ he panties’ Suamssstons. (Gomez Chill — b, bl-tv- 68°), LOL L538 AAW, 3 Cépwy-Jois)) oe

_ fule 60 Moon 46 Apsroparate Ans (SHorh, Be geanteh Gétause there □□□□□

et east A-genumne bISpuTE oF Metenind Slttouvorinvg LINGTHER 4% m mustastivic—

eemenres Loene Avpslasle To PansTPE

Aruany [6/2024 KesperlP|ly Summivtee

Tor Heap POSMSRET teu ch Yarn Ket We wh Wioce ben 8iGemvi/le, NY 25873 □□□

uyd, NY LOO0G Bn

ot He SCJ SONY £20 Pasae! Sh NY 40007

Plaintiff's Motion pursuant to Rule 60 of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (the “Motion”) is denied. (See Mot. (Dkt. No. 196).) As an initial matter, the Court notes that the Second Circuit has affirmed this Court’s decision granting summary judgment to Defendants. (See Dkt. No. 195.) Accordingly, “the law of the case doctrine bars the Court from granting Petitioner’s Rule 60 Motion.” Wright v. Poole, 81 F. Supp. 3d 280, 286 (S.D.N.Y. 2014). Under that doctrine, where, as here, “an appellate court has once decided an issue, the trial court, at a later stage of the litigation, is under a duty to follow the appellate court’s ruling on that issue.” Brown v. City of Syracuse, 673 F.3d 141, 147 (2d Cir. 2012); see also Wright, 81 F. Supp. at 286 (same). Moreover, insofar as Plaintiff relies on Rule 60(a), (see Mot. at 1, 8), such reliance is unavailing. “Rule 60(a) allows for the correction of clerical mistakes, oversights, and omissions in order to implement the result intended by the court at the time an order was entered.” Hines v. BMG Rts. Mgmt. (US) LLC, No. 20-CV-3535, 2024 WL 113498, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 10, 2024) (alteration and quotation marks omitted); see also Rezzonico v. H & R Block, Inc., 182 F.3d 144, 150 (2d Cir. 1999) (same). “However, a court acting pursuant to Rule 60(a) may not make changes that alter the original meaning of an order to correct a legal or factual error.” Hines, 2024 WL 113498, at *4 (alteration and quotation marks omitted). Quite simply, this Motion “falls outside the purview of Rule 60(a)” because it “does not direct the Court to any clerical error, oversight, or omission in the [summary judgment order and corresponding judgment] but rather argues that the Court erred in its holding.” Wright, 81 F. Supp. at 290 n.7 (quoting /nstinet Inc. v. Ariel (UK) Ltd., No. 08-CV-7141, 2010 WL 2674555, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. July 6, 2010)). Finally, with respect to Rule 60(b), the Court emphasizes that relief under that Rule is unavailable “where the moving party seeks solely to relitigate an issue already decided.” Hines, 2024 WL 113498, at *4. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the pending Motion, (see Dkt. No. 196), and to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiffs address. So Ordered. Cnt 1/25/2024