Hall v. A. Corp.

453 F.2d 1375
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided February 3, 1972·No. No. 424, Docket 71-1805·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The order is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Metzner reported at 330 F.Supp. 1352 (1971). The Clerk is directed to destroy all copies of the briefs except one, which he shall seal. He is also directed to seal all copies of the appendix pending possible transmission to the Clerk of the Supreme Court if appellant should petition for certiorari. If appellant should not so petition, the Clerk shall destroy all copies except one, which he shall seal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall v. A. Corp., 453 F.2d 1375 (2d Cir. 1972).

453 F.2d 1375 (Hall v. A. Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re George
28 S.W.3d 511 (Texas Supreme Court, 2000)
Chronicle Publishing Co. v. Hantzis
732 F. Supp. 270 (D. Massachusetts, 1990)
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Amundson
682 F. Supp. 981 (D. Minnesota, 1988)
John Doe, Etc. v. A Corporation
709 F.2d 1043 (Fifth Circuit, 1983)
Evans v. Artek Systems Corporation
715 F.2d 788 (Second Circuit, 1983)
Black v. State of Mo.
492 F. Supp. 848 (W.D. Missouri, 1980)
Housler v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF EAST ISLIP
484 F. Supp. 1321 (E.D. New York, 1980)
Cannon v. US Acoustics Corporation
398 F. Supp. 209 (N.D. Illinois, 1975)
Slater v. Rimar, Inc.
338 A.2d 584 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)