Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hale v. State

Hale v. State

254 So. 3d 662
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 15, 2018·No. No. 1D18-1534·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits. See Amato v. Winn Dixie Stores/Sedgwick James , 810 So.2d 979 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (observing that whether a motion to disqualify was timely filed generally will involve a factual determination, and thus, is reviewed to determine whether competent, substantial evidence supports the trial court's ruling).

Roberts, Rowe, and Ray, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hale v. State, 254 So. 3d 662 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

254 So. 3d 662 (Hale v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Amato v. Winn Dixie Stores/Sedgwick James
810 So. 2d 979 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)