Hale v. State

174 So. 3d 1103, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13913, 2015 WL 5460191
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 18, 2015
Docket2D14-5494
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 174 So. 3d 1103 (Hale v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hale v. State, 174 So. 3d 1103, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13913, 2015 WL 5460191 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

*1104 KHOUZAM, Judge.

Troy Hale appeals the order denying his motion for jail credit under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. We affirm without prejudice to Hale’s right to file a timely motion under rule 3.850. See Johnson v. State, 60 So.3d 1045, 1052 (Fla.2011). We caution, however, that “[wjhen a criminal defendant seeks to withdraw a negotiated plea, or to attack it collaterally, if he is successful he loses the benefit of the bargain he has elected to attack.” Id. (quoting Moreland v. Smith, 664 So.2d 1039, 1040 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)).

CRENSHAW and MORRIS, JJ„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Terrence Eugene Ancrum v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 So. 3d 1103, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13913, 2015 WL 5460191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hale-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.