Hale v. State

174 So. 3d 1103, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13913, 2015 WL 5460191
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 18, 2015·No. 2D14-5494·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*1104 KHOUZAM, Judge.

Troy Hale appeals the order denying his motion for jail credit under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. We affirm without prejudice to Hale’s right to file a timely motion under rule 3.850. See Johnson v. State, 60 So.3d 1045, 1052 (Fla.2011). We caution, however, that “[wjhen a criminal defendant seeks to withdraw a negotiated plea, or to attack it collaterally, if he is successful he loses the benefit of the bargain he has elected to attack.” Id. (quoting Moreland v. Smith, 664 So.2d 1039, 1040 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)).

CRENSHAW and MORRIS, JJ„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hale v. State, 174 So. 3d 1103, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13913, 2015 WL 5460191 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

174 So. 3d 1103 (Hale v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Terrence Eugene Ancrum v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019