Hale v. Every US President Since 1928
This text of Hale v. Every US President Since 1928 (Hale v. Every US President Since 1928) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
. -.- FILED JAN 2 9 2010 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Clerk, U.S. District and FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Bankruptcy Courts
Leroy J. Hale,
Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 10 0170 Every U.S. President Since 1928 et al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Plaintiff Leroy J. Hale has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis and a pro se
complaint. The application will be granted and the complaint will be dismissed.
The plaintiff has filed a complaint against numerous individuals, dead and alive, and
entities, including courts, clerks of court, hospitals, jails, banks, and the Senate Finance
Committee. The complaint does not appear to allege any wrong-doing by any individual or
entity. It states only that the "Blue Ridge East Mental Health and Virginia Assisted Living ...
want me to let them do a severe, extreme surgery procedure on me; that will [be] the second as I
have need for medical for a hernia [which] is the size of my fist." Compi. at 2 (punctuation
altered for readability). The remainder of the complaint seeks a variety of relief, of which the
following is representative: "I ask for 300 zillion court rulings for my perfect health. I ask for 89
zillion landmark court orders and 65 billion dollars for my perfect health care. I ask for 19
billion dollars. ... I ask for my releases and remedies from carpel tunnel syndrome and from
cruel and unusual punishment. For these reasons I ask for the Bill of Rights." Id. at 2-3 (spelling
and punctuation altered for readability). While complaints filed by pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than formal
pleadings drafted by lawyers, see Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972), even pro se
complaints must meet minimum the standards set by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237,239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon
which the court's jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement showing that the pleader is
entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks to obtain. Fed. R.
Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the
defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to prepare a responsive answer and an adequate
defense, and to determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75
F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). As drafted, this complaint does not identify a claim, establish
this court's jurisdiction, or provide the defendants with notice of allegations against them.
Accordingly, the complaint will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with Rule 8
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
A separate order accompanies this memorandum opinion.
Date: ~. ;;:l~OJD/J
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hale v. Every US President Since 1928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hale-v-every-us-president-since-1928-dcd-2010.