Hajducko v. Heidelberg-Eastern, Inc.
438 So. 2d 1052, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24514
Opinion
We have carefully examined each of the points raised by the appellants and conclude that harmful error has not been demonstrated. See Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Ganey, 125 So.2d 576 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960); Crews v. Warren, 157 So.2d 553 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963); Eckert v. Government Employees Ins. Co., 334 So.2d 119 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Bailey v. Deverick, 142 So.2d 775 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962); Sec. 59.041, Fla.Stat. (1981).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hajducko v. Heidelberg-Eastern, Inc., 438 So. 2d 1052, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24514 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).
438 So. 2d 1052 (Hajducko v. Heidelberg-Eastern, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bailey v. Deverick
142 So. 2d 775 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Ganey
125 So. 2d 576 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Eckert v. Government Employees Insurance Co.
334 So. 2d 119 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Crews v. Warren
157 So. 2d 553 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)