Hairston v. Walker

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1005

IRENE F. HAIRSTON; PEGGY M. H. ROBINS; DELORIS A. MCKNIGHT,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

WILLIAM WALKER, Esquire; BRENT STEVENS, Esquire; CRAIG, BRAWLEY, LUPFERT & WALKER, STEVENS, L.L.P.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (1:06-cv-00102-NCT-WWD)

Submitted: May 29, 2008 Decided: June 4, 2008

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Irene F. Hairston, Peggy M. H. Robins, Deloris A. McKnight, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, for Appellants. William Watts Walker, CRAIG, BRAWLEY, LUPFERT & WALKER, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Irene F. Hairston, Peggy M. H. Robins, and Deloris A.

McKnight appeal from the district court’s order dismissing their

civil complaint and denying their motion for reconsideration, Fed.

R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Hairston v. Walker, No. 1:06-cv-00102-NCT-WWD

(M.D.N.C. July 19 & Oct. 29, 2007). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -