Hairston v. Walker

Fourth Circuit

Hairston v. Walker

280 F. App'x 300

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 4, 2008·No. No. 08-1005·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Irene F. Hairston, Peggy M.H. Robins, and Deloris A. McKnight appeal from the district court’s order dismissing their civil complaint and denying their motion for reconsideration, Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). We [301]*301have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hairston v. Walker, No. 1:06-cv-00102-NCT-WWD, 2007 WL 2112245 (M.D.N.C. July 19, 2007) & (Oct. 29, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Irene F. Hairston, Peggy M.H. Robins, and Deloris A. McKnight appeal from the district court’s order dismissing their civil complaint and denying their motion for reconsideration, Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). We [301]*301have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hairston v. Walker, No. 1:06-cv-00102-NCT-WWD, 2007 WL 2112245 (M.D.N.C. July 19, 2007) & (Oct. 29, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hairston v. Walker, 280 F. App'x 300 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

280 F. App'x 300 (Hairston v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.