Hairston v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DN ts SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED; __ 99/03/2021 DENISE HAIRSTON, on behalf of Jayven Tash Sanders- Hairston, Plaintiff, 20-CV-5432 (ALC) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., United States District Judge: By order dated June 7, 2021, the Court directed Plaintiff, within thirty days, to submit a completed request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP application”) or pay the $400.00 in fees required to file a civil action in this Court. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an IFP application or paid the fee. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: September 3, 2021 New York, New York [Ayrdhoe 7 fee ANDREW L. CARTER United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hairston v. Commissioner of Social Security (Hairston v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.