Haile v. Holder

468 F. App'x 220
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 7, 2012
DocketNo. 11-1686
StatusPublished
Cited by29 cases

This text of 468 F. App'x 220 (Haile v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haile v. Holder, 468 F. App'x 220 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rahel Woldegebriel Haile, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Haile’s motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2011). We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Haile (B.I.A. May 31, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
468 F. App'x 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haile-v-holder-ca4-2012.