Haile v. Holder

468 F. App'x 220
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 7, 2012·No. No. 11-1686·Published·Cited by 29 cases

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rahel Woldegebriel Haile, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Haile’s motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2011). We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Haile (B.I.A. May 31, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haile v. Holder, 468 F. App'x 220 (4th Cir. 2012).

468 F. App'x 220 (Haile v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related