Haher v. Pelusio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Haher v. Pelusio

156 A.D.3d 1382, 65 N.Y.S.3d 852

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 22, 2017

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 156 A.D.3d 1382 (Haher v. Pelusio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haher v. Pelusio, 156 A.D.3d 1382, 65 N.Y.S.3d 852 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Matthew A. Rosenbaum, J.), entered January 25, 2017. The order, inter alia, denied the motion of defendants to suspend certain payments required to be made to plaintiff under the parties’ agreement based upon lack of funds.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Haher v Pelusio ([appeal No. 1] 156 AD3d 1381 [2017]).

Present—Carni, J.P., Lindley, DeJo-seph, Troutman and Winslow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Matthew A. Rosenbaum, J.), entered January 25, 2017. The order, inter alia, denied the motion of defendants to suspend certain payments required to be made to plaintiff under the parties’ agreement based upon lack of funds.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Haher v Pelusio ([appeal No. 1] 156 AD3d 1381 [2017]).

Present—Carni, J.P., Lindley, DeJo-seph, Troutman and Winslow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

156 A.D.3d 1382, 65 N.Y.S.3d 852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haher-v-pelusio-nyappdiv-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack