Haggett v. Voboril

2018 WI App 66, 921 N.W.2d 527, 384 Wis. 2d 415
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin·Decided September 12, 2018·No. Appeal No. 2017AP2039·Published

Opinion

HAGEDORN, J.1

¶ 1 In August 2017, Shannon Patrick Haggett filed a small claims summons and complaint against Joseph R. Voboril. Default judgment was entered against Voboril for $1144.50. Voboril subsequently filed a motion to reopen the judgment, which the circuit court denied. Voboril now appeals, but he appeals from the default judgment and not the order denying his motion to reopen.

¶ 2 WISCONSIN STAT. § 799.29(1)(a) provides that, in small claims actions, "[t]here shall be no appeal from default judgments, but the trial court may, by order, reopen default judgments upon notice and motion or petition duly made and good cause shown." Because the default judgment is not an appealable order, we do not have jurisdiction to review this appeal and it must be dismissed.2 Thomas/Van Dyken Joint Venture v. Van Dyken , 90 Wis. 2d 236, 241, 279 N.W.2d 459 (1979) ("If the judgment is not appealable, this court is without jurisdiction to consider the merits of the controversy.").

By the Court. -Appeal dismissed.

This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haggett v. Voboril, 2018 WI App 66, 921 N.W.2d 527, 384 Wis. 2d 415 (Wis. Ct. App. 2018).

2018 WI App 66 (Haggett v. Voboril) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas/Van Dyken Joint Venture v. Van Dyken
279 N.W.2d 459 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1979)
General Telephone Co. of Wi, Inc. v. a Corp.
433 N.W.2d 264 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1988)