Hagan v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hagan v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8483
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 16, 2016·No. 2D14-1100·Published

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

MICHAEL A. HAGAN, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D14-1100 )

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________ )

Opinion filed March 16, 2016.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; John K. Stargel, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Terrence E. Kehoe, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wendy Buffington, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

SILBERMAN, Judge.

Michael A. Hagan seeks review of his judgment and sentences for tampering with evidence and second-degree murder. We affirm Hagan's convictions without comment. As for Hagan's challenge to his sentences, we reverse for the sole purpose of amending the sentences to reflect the relief granted pursuant to his motion to correct sentencing error.

At the sentencing hearing, the trial court orally pronounced sentences of life in prison with a twenty-five-year mandatory minimum for second-degree murder and five years in prison for tampering with evidence. The court imposed the life sentence consecutive to the five-year sentence. However, the written sentence reverses the designation and imposes the five-year sentence consecutive to the life sentence. After the notice of appeal was filed, Hagan filed a motion to correct sentencing error pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b) in which he argued that the written sentence fails to comport with the court's oral pronouncement. The trial court granted relief on this basis and ordered that the written sentence be corrected to designate the life sentence as consecutive to the five-year sentence. Despite these directions, an amended sentence has not yet been entered. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the entry of an amended sentence reflecting the relief granted.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

LaROSE and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hagan v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Hagan v. State (Hagan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.