Hagan v. State
This text of Hagan v. State (Hagan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
MICHAEL A. HAGAN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D14-1100 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________ )
Opinion filed March 16, 2016.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; John K. Stargel, Judge.
Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Terrence E. Kehoe, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wendy Buffington, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
SILBERMAN, Judge.
Michael A. Hagan seeks review of his judgment and sentences for
tampering with evidence and second-degree murder. We affirm Hagan's convictions
without comment. As for Hagan's challenge to his sentences, we reverse for the sole
purpose of amending the sentences to reflect the relief granted pursuant to his motion
to correct sentencing error. At the sentencing hearing, the trial court orally pronounced sentences of
life in prison with a twenty-five-year mandatory minimum for second-degree murder and
five years in prison for tampering with evidence. The court imposed the life sentence
consecutive to the five-year sentence. However, the written sentence reverses the
designation and imposes the five-year sentence consecutive to the life sentence. After
the notice of appeal was filed, Hagan filed a motion to correct sentencing error pursuant
to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b) in which he argued that the written
sentence fails to comport with the court's oral pronouncement. The trial court granted
relief on this basis and ordered that the written sentence be corrected to designate the
life sentence as consecutive to the five-year sentence. Despite these directions, an
amended sentence has not yet been entered. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for
the entry of an amended sentence reflecting the relief granted.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
LaROSE and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hagan v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hagan-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.