Hagan v. State

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 16, 2016
Docket2D14-1100
StatusPublished

This text of Hagan v. State (Hagan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hagan v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

MICHAEL A. HAGAN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D14-1100 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________ )

Opinion filed March 16, 2016.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; John K. Stargel, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Terrence E. Kehoe, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wendy Buffington, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

SILBERMAN, Judge.

Michael A. Hagan seeks review of his judgment and sentences for

tampering with evidence and second-degree murder. We affirm Hagan's convictions

without comment. As for Hagan's challenge to his sentences, we reverse for the sole

purpose of amending the sentences to reflect the relief granted pursuant to his motion

to correct sentencing error. At the sentencing hearing, the trial court orally pronounced sentences of

life in prison with a twenty-five-year mandatory minimum for second-degree murder and

five years in prison for tampering with evidence. The court imposed the life sentence

consecutive to the five-year sentence. However, the written sentence reverses the

designation and imposes the five-year sentence consecutive to the life sentence. After

the notice of appeal was filed, Hagan filed a motion to correct sentencing error pursuant

to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b) in which he argued that the written

sentence fails to comport with the court's oral pronouncement. The trial court granted

relief on this basis and ordered that the written sentence be corrected to designate the

life sentence as consecutive to the five-year sentence. Despite these directions, an

amended sentence has not yet been entered. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for

the entry of an amended sentence reflecting the relief granted.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

LaROSE and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hagan v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hagan-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.