Haeussler Investment Co. v. Bates
271 U.S. 647, 46 S. Ct. 487
Opinion
Affirmed upon the authority of Withnell v. Ruecking Construction Co., 249 U. S. 63, 69; Hancock v. City of Muskogee, 250 U. S. 454, 456; Goldsmith v. Prendergast Construction Co., 252 U. S. 12; (2) Valley Farms Co. v. Westchester County, 261 U. S. 155.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Haeussler Investment Co. v. Bates, 271 U.S. 647, 46 S. Ct. 487 (1926).
271 U.S. 647 (Haeussler Investment Co. v. Bates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Withnell v. Ruecking Construction Co.
249 U.S. 63 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Hancock v. City of Muskogee
250 U.S. 454 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Goldsmith v. George G. Prendergast Construction Co.
252 U.S. 12 (Supreme Court, 1920)
Valley Farms Co. of Yonkers v. County of Westchester
261 U.S. 155 (Supreme Court, 1923)