Haeussler Investment Co. v. Bates
271 U.S. 647, 46 S. Ct. 487
This text of 271 U.S. 647 (Haeussler Investment Co. v. Bates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Haeussler Investment Co. v. Bates, 271 U.S. 647, 46 S. Ct. 487 (1926).
Opinion
Affirmed upon the authority of Withnell v. Ruecking Construction Co., 249 U. S. 63, 69; Hancock v. City of Muskogee, 250 U. S. 454, 456; Goldsmith v. Prendergast Construction Co., 252 U. S. 12; (2) Valley Farms Co. v. Westchester County, 261 U. S. 155.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Withnell v. Ruecking Construction Co.
249 U.S. 63 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Hancock v. City of Muskogee
250 U.S. 454 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Goldsmith v. George G. Prendergast Construction Co.
252 U.S. 12 (Supreme Court, 1920)
Valley Farms Co. of Yonkers v. County of Westchester
261 U.S. 155 (Supreme Court, 1923)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
271 U.S. 647, 46 S. Ct. 487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haeussler-investment-co-v-bates-scotus-1926.